概括大意与完成句子

第23～30题，每题1分，共8分，阅读下面这篇短文，短文后有2项测试任务：(1) 第23～26题要求从所给的6个选项中为第1～4段每段选择1个正确的小标题；(2) 第27～30题要求从所给的6个选项中选择4个正确选项，分别完成每个句子。请将答案涂在答题卡相应的位置上。 1、 The Rights of Animals
　　1 Do animals have rights?This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground-clearing way to start. Actually, it isn’t, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.
　　2 On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd;for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only on account, and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people—for instance, to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented it：how do you reply to somebody who says “I don’t like this contract”?
　　3 The point is this：without agreement on the rights of people arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless. It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset：it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another, more fundamental, question：is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all?
　　4 Many deny it. Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.
　　5 This view which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood, may seem bravely “logical”. In fact it is simply shallow：the confused centre is right to reject it. The most elementary form of moral reasoning—the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl—is to weigh others’ interests against one’s own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination:without which there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. When that happens, it is not a mistake:it is mankind’s instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.

参考答案： E    

答案解析： If Animals Have Rights?

123 Paragraph 1
　　

A. Arguing about the Rights of Animal Is Foolish

B.Sympathy to the Animals Should Be Encourage

C.The Human’s View Is Fruitful

D.Rights Exist only Within a Social Contract

E.If Animals Have Rights?

F.The Most Elementary Form of Moral Reasoning

参考答案： D    

答案解析： Rights Exist only Within a Social Contract

224 Paragraph 2

A. Arguing about the Rights of Animal Is Foolish

B.Sympathy to the Animals Should Be Encourage

C.The Human’s View Is Fruitful

D.Rights Exist only Within a Social Contract

E.If Animals Have Rights?

F.The Most Elementary Form of Moral Reasoning

参考答案： A    

答案解析：  Arguing about the Rights of Animal Is Foolish

325 Paragraph 3

A. Arguing about the Rights of Animal Is Foolish

B.Sympathy to the Animals Should Be Encourage

C.The Human’s View Is Fruitful

D.Rights Exist only Within a Social Contract

E.If Animals Have Rights?

F.The Most Elementary Form of Moral Reasoning

参考答案： B    

答案解析： Sympathy to the Animals Should Be Encourage

426 Paragraph 4

A. Arguing about the Rights of Animal Is Foolish

B.Sympathy to the Animals Should Be Encourage

C.The Human’s View Is Fruitful

D.Rights Exist only Within a Social Contract

E.If Animals Have Rights?

F.The Most Elementary Form of Moral Reasoning

参考答案： D    

答案解析： is to weigh other’s interest against one’s own

5The most elementary form of moral reasoning .
　　

A.should be encouraged rather than laughed at

B.a sentimental displacement of feeling

C.can have for people who never consented it?

D.is to weigh other’s interest against one’s own

E. it invites you to think that animals should be treated with no consideration

F. human are different from animals in every respect

参考答案： A    

答案解析： should be encouraged rather than laughed at

6Mankind’s instinct for moral reasoning in action .
　　

A.should be encouraged rather than laughed at

B.a sentimental displacement of feeling

C.can have for people who never consented it?

D.is to weigh other’s interest against one’s own

E. it invites you to think that animals should be treated with no consideration

F. human are different from animals in every respect

参考答案： C    

答案解析： can have for people who never consented it?

7It is unclear what force a contract .
　　

A.should be encouraged rather than laughed at

B.a sentimental displacement of feeling

C.can have for people who never consented it?

D.is to weigh other’s interest against one’s own

E. it invites you to think that animals should be treated with no consideration

F. human are different from animals in every respect

参考答案： E    

答案解析：  it invites you to think that animals should be treated with no consideration

8 It leads the discussion .

A.should be encouraged rather than laughed at

B.a sentimental displacement of feeling

C.can have for people who never consented it?

D.is to weigh other’s interest against one’s own

E. it invites you to think that animals should be treated with no consideration

F. human are different from animals in every respect

首页 上页 2 3 4 下页 尾页 3/12/12

 ★ 职称英语考试导航 ★